Find Seized Car Auctions Near You

Know Where To Buy Your Dream Car For A Low Price!

Whether It Is A Mercedes, BMW, Honda, SUVs, Trucks...

Drive Your Dream Car For 90% Below Retail Prices!

Start Looking For Your Dream Car Now!

25 Comments »

1. 

   strykers arent bad, they just dont offer anything a smaller apc cant, and because their larger theyre harder to deploy, harder to move through urban environments (which ironically is what they were designed to do..) and the sryker shouldve been about the same size as the LAV300 V300 without slated armor (slated armor should be attached after deployment do to space restrictions/)

   Comment by KottonmouthSoldiers — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

2. 

   WTF is the gunner doing???!!!!he had a clear line of fire @ 5:42!!!!!! and has the crew never heard of a secondary armament, such as an MG, or Rapid-fire grenade launchers????!!!!!!!!

   Comment by ibuggerdonkeys — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

3. 

   Sound is everywhere

   Comment by EJ205T — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

4. 

   where is sound????

   Comment by justamanorboy — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

5. 

   SOUND where is it`?

   Comment by IamJacksColon4 — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

6. 

   STRYKERS are deathtraps. Bring back the GAVIN!

   Comment by katey1dog — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

7. 

   IMHO… At this level of sophistication the LEO2, Challenger and M1A2 are essentially equal. If you were to put all three on a battlefield (against each other) the winner would be the best crew…. not the best tank. That said, Land Rover/Range Rover…BEST 4X4′s ever made.

   Comment by cf80to01 — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

8. 

   It is the heaviest armoured tank in the world, so I have no idea what ACESNIPER is talking about. Only one Challenger has been lost due to “fire”. That fire came from another tank. That tank was a Challenger 2.

   Comment by DanVielwerth — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

9. 

   I LOVE HIS SHOW!!!!!!

   Comment by marco6981 — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

10. 

    0:06 get ya salvo out!!

    Comment by o0joycey0o — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

11. 

    PT6 – The Chall2 is the best MBT as it uses Hydrogas suspension, giving superior off- road mobility, has the most advanced composite armour in the world, designed to take multiple strikes, unlike passive & spaced, and uses a rifled cannon giving higher accuracy.

    Comment by TankNutDave — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

12. 

    Challe 2 Rules, Rolls Royce engine ! need I say more ? CV12TCA ! excellent !

    Comment by tnicola826 — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

13. 

    I think economically speaking, the Challenger offers more bang per buck, that has always been the way the British military does things, comes from having a bloated empire then a hefting welfare state IMHO the military can’t be an economic burden.
    I figured the USA has 5x abrams as it has 5x as many tax paying citizens (and a stronger economy). This is all my armchair historian/tactician opinion but I may be missing something vital.

    Comment by Treblaine — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

14. 

    ACESNIPER093 concludes:

    “However the german leppard tends to posses more effective on the battle field than both of these tanks. the leppard is like the king koiengstiger of wwii it is able to withstand more hits than both of these tanks although much is classified about these tanks the order from best to worst is as follows

    1. 2A5 Leppard (GERMANY)
    2. M1A1 ABRAMS(U.S.A.)
    3. CHALLENGER MK 4(U.K)”

    Comment by dynmicpara — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

15. 

    ACESNIPER093 continues:

    “abrams also has state of the art explosive shells how ever the challengers gun happens to be 125mm which is slightly more than the abrams also there isnt enough challengers aroubd to really put fear into the enemy but this debate has been going on for so long both tanks have their flaws they actually are almost equal and they are the 2 best tanks in production in their time both have the same types of armor that originated from england called chobbam.”

    Comment by dynmicpara — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

16. 

    ACESNIPER093 writes:

    “challenger VS. m1a1 abrams

    the challenger tends to be slightly less manuaverable then the m1a1 abrams also an abrams can with stand more explosive rounds than a challenger the abrams has been mass produced out numbering the challenger 1:5 and it is said that na abrams can continue to operate in an area that has rescently been hit with radioactive ordiance.

    Comment by dynmicpara — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

17. 

    In real war they would’ve disabled the vehicle in 5 seconds with the L94A1 chain gun shot the engine and tyres, then shelled it.

    Comment by IdunCareLesSn00b — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

18. 

    Fucking Awesome, Favorited.

    “Wrath of Khan” music very appropriate.

    Comment by TariqAlSuave — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

19. 

    Good fun clip from ‘Top Gear’
    The regiment was 1RTR, my regiment. The area was Salisbury Plain where 1RTR have a squadron for demo & training of new officers etc.

    Comment by mountainboy2465 — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

20. 

    lol you silly brits..I dop love your tank..best in the world in my openion

    Comment by americaneagle1967 — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

21. 

    However, NEITHER good for CLOSED TERRAIN combat operations.

    Comment by dynmicpara — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

22. 

    good products Range Rover AND Challenger 2.

    Comment by slkw680 — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

23. 

    Rather fun video.

    Comment by TheTBagg — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

24. 

    LLMMFFAAOO!!!!!!!!!!!! i have to get one of those cars.

    Comment by OldTerkeyBuzzerd — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

25. 

    wow

    Comment by lumpwump — July 18, 2009 @ 7:12 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website