Site Map

Categories

Testimonials


"I was looking for a car through AutoTrader, but decided to join Gov-Auctions.org and I bought my new car and saved over $8700"

Client: Frank T. (Buffalo, NY)
Vehicle: 2003 VW Passat
Book Value: $17,789
Purchase Price: $9,050
Savings: $8,739

"Many thanks to your team at Gov-Auctions.org. Your information was current and very helpful. Keep up the good work you guys"

Client: Chris W. (El Cajon, CA)
Vehicle: 2002 Ford Expedition EB
Book Value: $18,944
Purchase Price: $8,000
Savings: $10,944

"I didn't think it was possible to buy a reliable car for under $500. WOW! I own my car for the same price as other people's monthly payment"

Client: Cliff S. (Ft. Worth, TX)
Vehicle: 2002 Hyundai Elantra
Book Value: $9,975
Purchase Price: $475
Savings: $9,500

Find Car Auction

Recent Posts

Resources



Find Seized Car Auctions Near You

Know Where To Buy Your Dream Car For A Low Price!

Whether It Is A Mercedes, BMW, Honda, SUVs, Trucks...

Drive Your Dream Car For 90% Below Retail Prices!

Start Looking For Your Dream Car Now!


You may think that getting pulled over by a police office for a traffic violation is stressful, but if you have ever been on the receiving end of traffic tickets you know that the stress does not stop there. Once you have received a violation you have the option of paying the fee and having the ticket stick to your driving record, at least for your provinces required period of time. A traffic violation will also increase your insurance premium rates. Your second option is to dispute your violation in a court of law.

Several provinces will allow you to challenge an officer’s subjectivity. Challenge the officer’s view of how he/she perceived your actions. Getting pulled over for making an ‘unsafe’ left turn can be easily challenged. Describe how the officer was at a vantage point where he/she could not make this call. Describe how you were acting accordingly and safely.

In order to avoid the scenario of your word against the officer’s word, bring factual evidence with you. Typically, when it is your story against the story of a law officer the judge will often side with the officer. This means you can not depend solely on your words as a means of defense. In order to raise doubt in the mind of the judge, you have to bring convincing evidence of your account of what happened.

If possible bring eyewitness accounts of the incident. People who seen the alleged incident such as passengers or bystanders can work as eyewitnesses. Visual aids, such as a simple diagram showing your vehicle and the police vehicle can be helpful aids. These diagrams can explain how the officer was not in a position to make a clear call from his vantage point.

Photographs are another example of visual aids. Bring photos of hidden or damaged road signs. This can help illustrate how you did not see the sign. You can also use this as another means of detailing the officer’s weak vantage point. For instance, snap a few pictures from where the police car was standing, and where your own vehicle was. This may raise questions about just how clear of a judgment the police officer made.

Proving there were circumstances beyond your control may help in your favour. For instance, if you unknowingly passed a pedestrian walk because the strips were not visible (because they were faded), how could you have stopped? You could not stop because you didn’t know you had to stop in the first place. This makes the violation, although committed, an honest mistake.

In some cases trying to prove that your actions were legally justified may help in your favour. You may have been driving slowly in the left lane in order to prepare for a legal left turn. Although you may have actually been driving slowly, you were preparing to make a safe turn.

Sometimes it may feel like beating the system is impossible. It may also be easier to just pay the fines associated with traffic tickets and move on. On the other hand, traffic violations can be very costly and not only in the immediate sense. You will have to face increased insurance rates as a result of this violation as well.

In need of professional and affordable representation for traffic tickets Durham? As Ontario’s leading legal services provider, they are committed to providing effective legal services that you can afford.

Slam locks are, as the name might suggest, a form of locks that causes a vehicle door to lock when it is closed. It will not then reopen until the right key is used. The automatic nature of slam locks means that locking up when the driver leaves the vehicle isn’t something that can be forgotten, thus improving the overall security of a vehicle.

Cargo crime is costing a fortune in the European Union. The EU’s statistics tells us that European businesses are being hit with a bill of eight and a half billion Euros every single year. Many of the offences taking place on the roads of Europe are being carried out by criminal gangs who are well organised and know the transport routes well.

Commercial freight vehicles are an appealing target for criminals. This is down to the fact that accessing vehicles on the roads is comparatively easy and they are often carrying a lot of merchandise with an extremely high value. Drivers should also be taking regular breaks on the road and some even have to sleep in their vehicles, making them an easier target still.

Because a slam lock forces the door to lock every single time a driver closes it, the human error element can be removed. There are countless instances of cargo crime offences that take place when a driver simply forgets to lock his door when leaving the vehicle at services etc.

This type of locking solution is probably really a minimum requirement in order to minimise the risk of theft from a commercial transporting vehicle. There are now so many other advanced security measures on the market, such as alarm systems and immobilisers and they’re all there with to protect against the very real threat of cargo crime. It seems, to a degree, almost unfair that a company or individual should have to invest so heavily just to prevent criminals from striking, but with the potential cost of a theft from a transport vehicle, it’s often money well spent.

Find out more about Slam Lock devices and other vehicle security measures.

There is rising pressure facing the UK government to reduce the legal limit of alcohol consumption when driving. The current limit stands at 80mg per 100ml of blood which relates to approximately a pint and a half of medium strength lager for an average sized man. The proposed limit would bring it down to 50mg per 100ml of blood which is little more than half a pint or a large glass of wine which is in line with the European Union limit.

Current UK law states that anyone found driving over the legal limit faces an automatic 12 month driving ban but Sir Peter North QC is currently investigating the possibilities of introducing a second, lower penalty for anyone above the lower limit such as 6 points on a driving licence. Changes could also see prosecutions for drivers found with illegal drugs in their bloodstream, regardless of whether it impaired their performance.

According to Lord Adonis, the Transport Secretary, 430 people were killed as a result of drink driving last year however this figure only refers to people who were over the current legal limit. He also suggests drug-driving is a key concern for the public.

Sir Peter added: ”Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs still leads to a large number of deaths and serious injuries. The challenge is to see whether changes in the law and its processes can reduce casualties.”

AA President, Edmund King also added “the legal issue is more complex than the limit as a sliding scale of penalties could reduce the deterrent effect. There is a serious problem with drink drive repeat offenders with recent figures suggesting that almost a quarter of drink drivers have served a previous ban.”

The proposal is not met with open arms by everyone though, Tony Payne, chief executive of the Federation of Licensed Victuallers Associations argued “We will fight this very very strongly,” he said. “This will penalise responsible people because of the behaviour of some idiots.

Thousands of motorists are prosecuted every year for a drink driving offence but the punishments for speeding are far less despite it causing a significantly higher number of deaths each year.

Traffic tickets can stick with you for a while. Some states will keep this violation on your record for 2 or 3 years. You will also face higher insurance premiums, once you have paid the expensive fee that often accompanies a violation. If you feel that you were unjustly served a violation, there are a number of techniques you can use in court in order to prevent this violation from sticking to your record.

Typically, a violation is given due to the subjective judgment of a police office. Challenge this view, but make sure to use facts to back up your argument to make it reasonable. When you only depend on your word versus the officer’s word, the judge will most likely side with the officer. For instance, challenge where the officer was located, and how this may have hindered his viewpoint of what actually happened.

There are practical steps you can take to create doubt in a judge’s mind. Remember; do not only rely on your words and your version of the story. Gather real information and facts to build your case.

Example of case building can be the gathering of eyewitness statements. Take statements from bystanders or the passenger in the car, who may be willing to testify on your behalf. Present a simple and easy to understand diagram of the location of the incident. This may be particularly helpful if you are disputing an incident that involves an intersection. Consult assistance with a professional criminal lawyer if you feel unprepared for your trial.

Present pictures of road signs or conditions that may have provoked your driving. These pictures can be used to show unclear road signs, such as a stop sign covered by a tree, etc. You can also use this strategy to show that the officer may not have had a clear vantage point of what supposed driving violation you committed, from where the police car was parked.

Prove to the judge that you made an honest, unintentional mistake. This may happen if you failed to stop at a pedestrian stop because the strips were faded. You may have missed a stop sign that has just been placed. With this strategy you are building a case that you could not have known what action was required of you, since the conditions were so unclear.

Sometimes you may have had to actually do what you are being violated for. In this case, you may seek legal justification. For instance, you may have been driving slowly in the left lane because you were preparing for a legal left turn. You may have switched lanes without using a signal because a car was closing in on you quickly, and you were afraid of being part of an accident.

It may seem that fighting traffic tickets are a lost cause, but not fighting them may become a burden to your wallet. You will have to pay the fee that is associated with the violation. Then, you can also expect to pay higher premium rates on your automobile insurance. In addition, you can also expect demerit points placed on your license. Depending on your state these points may stay on your license anywhere from 2-3 years.

As the leading professional legal services across the province, our team of DUI lawyer Toronto will assist you with any traffic tickets. We specialize in representing drunk and driving Toronto clients charged with traffic offences, as well as compliance management services for the trucking industry.

Newer Posts »
Powered by Yahoo! Answers